Obama will go to trial on January 26, 2010 on Eligibility Case in California
Finally! After 30+ cases in the US regarding Obama’s presidential eligibility because he is Kenyan-born, not Hawaiian-born, one court from California has accepted to call Obama on trial on January 26, 2010! At one case, a corrupted judge even fined Orly Taitz, lawyer and activist with $20,000 for constantly trying to call Obama on court. The given reason for the huge fine was that she was “abusing the court”.
AXJ members in Santa Ana, CA., USA are confirming information from the Court Room that the Honorable Judge David O. Carter has granted defendants standing in this case, has dismissed the DOJ’s motion to dismiss, and has ordered immediate discovery.
All those that go against this Court Order will be held in Contempt of Court.
US Marshalls are preparing to make the Order efective in the State of Hawaii and the Embassy of Kenya in Washington, D.C. will be receiving a copy of the Rogatory Letters.
More to come…
Judge Carter Denies Motion to Dismiss, in Barnett vs. Obama!
off a blog; http://thepostnemail.wordpress.com/
Judge Carter Denies Motion to Dismiss, in Barnett vs. Obama!
October 7, 2009 by John Charlton
COURT ORDER FINALIZES SCHEDULE FOR TRIAL!
by John Charlton
(Oct. 7, 2009) — Today was published the Court order resulting from the Oct. 5th hearing in Barnett vs. Obama, issued by federal judge, David O. Carter, in the Southern Division of California.
The order, reads as follows:
On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates. The Court now orders those dates be made final.
Case Management dates are as follows:
Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing — December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.
File Motion for Summary Judgment — November 16, 2009
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment — November 26, 2009
Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment — November 30, 2009
Final Pretrial Conference — January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
Jury Trial — January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
The implication of the Court’s order finalizing the dates is obvious: you do not finalize dates unless there will be a trial. And there would not be a trial, unless the Motion to Dismiss requested by the Defense was in whole or in part DENIED!
Trying to confirm, but this means it will be heard on the merits!
Orly’s site has been updated!
http://www.orlytaitzesq.com/
Actual order from judge Carter:my case Barnett et al v Obama et al is going to trial, dates are final, January 26 is the date for the jury trial
Posted on | October 7, 2009 | No Comments
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL
CV-90 (12/02)
CIVIL MINUTES – GENERAL Page 1 of 1
Case No. SACV09-0082 DOC (ANx) Date October 5, 2009
Title CAPTAIN PAMELA BARNETT, ET AL. V. BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, ET AL.
Present: The
Honorable
David O. Carter, U.S. District Judge
Kristee Hopkins Debbie Gale N/A
Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Tape No.
Attorneys Present for Plaintiffs: Attorneys Present for Defendants:
Orly Taitz
Gary Kreep
David DeJute, AUSA
Roger West, AUSA
Proceedings: 1. MOTION BY DEFENDANTS TO DISMISS CASE
2. SCHEDULING CONFERENCE
Cause called and counsel state their appearances. Argument by counsel. Motion taken
under submission.
On September 8, 2009, the Court previously set tentative case management dates. The
Court now orders those dates be made final.
Case Management dates are as follows:
Motion for Summary Judgment Hearing December 7, 2009, at 8:30 a.m.
File Motion for Summary Judgment November 16, 2009
Opposition to Motion for Summary Judgment November 26, 2009
Reply to Motion for Summary Judgment November 30, 2009
Final Pretrial Conference January 11, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
Jury Trial January 26, 2010, at 8:30 a.m.
3
: 21
01
Initials of Preparer kh
Case 8:09-cv-00082-DOC-AN Document 81 Filed 10/05/2009 Page 1 of 1
Category: Events, HOT ITEMS!, Latest News, Legal Actions, Supporting Documentation
You can see the response from Roger West, lead attorney for Obama
Posted on | October 7, 2009 | No Comments
Flag this message
Laconic Response from AUSA Roger West
Wednesday, October 7, 2009 12:03 PM From: This sender is DomainKeys verified “Charles Lincoln” View contact details To: “Dr. Orly Taitz” RE: Dr. Taitz seeks stipulation re: Discovery. Mittwoch, den 7. Oktober 2009, 11:31:18 Uhr
Von: “West, Roger (USACAC)” Karte anzeigen
An: Charles Lincoln
——————————————————————————–
Nuts.
From: Charles Lincoln [mailto:charles.lincoln@rocketmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 07, 2009 11:11 AM
To: Dejute, David (USACAC); West, Roger (USACAC)
Subject: Dr. Taitz seeks stipulation re: Discovery.
Dear Messers DeJute & West:
Dr. Taitz has asked me to ask you whether you are willing to stipulate that, now that the Scheduling Order has been made final, rather than moot, that it is now time for us to begin discovery. We need to start sending out notices of deposition duces tecum to parties and subpoenas duces tecum to non-parties. The Judge specifically said that the Scheduling order would only be important if the case were going to go forward, and he seems to have spoken on this point.
Charles E. Lincoln, Research Associate & Law Clerk for Dr. Taitz, Esq., Attorney for the Plaintiffs.
Deo Vindice
“May the Lord God be with you,
and with thy spirit!”
My assistant, Mr. Lincoln has contacted Roger West, assistant US attorney, lead attorney representing the defendants, asking to stipulate to discovery in light of today’s order by Judge Carter. You can see his polite and constructive response “Nuts”. I wonder, if I wasn’t a woman, if I was a part of good old boys club, would there be a more appropriate response.
Related posts:
- Obama eligibility case will be heard on merits!! Please distribute everywhere. Just got off the phone with...
- California high court upholds same-sex marriage ban California’s highest court upheld a voter-approved ban on same-sex...
- Budget Cuts Could Close Over 200 Parks In California A drastic plan to slash California’s budget could mean...
- Major victory for Army warrior questioning Obama’s birthplace A U.S. Army Reserve major from Florida scheduled to...
- Geert Wilders Trial : The 18 people Geert Wilders wanted to call as witnesses Dr. Wafa Sultan Wafa Sultan became famous when she...
Tags: Barack Obama Trial, KEYES VS OBAMA WILL GO TO TRIAL ON JANUARY 26 2010, OBAMA GOING TO TRIAL FINALLY! ON HIS ILLEGAL ALIEN STATUS, Obama Illegal Alien, Obama Jury Trial Dates Made Final on Eligibility Case in California, Obama Trial 26 January 2010, The Big Obama Trial, The Obama Trial
Rate This Article
(4 votes, average: 5.00 out of 5)
Loading ...
Print This Post
If you enjoyed this post, please consider to leave a comment or subscribe to the feed and get future articles delivered to your feed reader.
Loading ...
I hope I read this right! Is the DOJ dismissal order rejected by Judge Carter for sure and not just that court dates are issued and recorded, and has discovery already been addressed.
America may have hope if these two assumptions are correct. This is the first I have read about the dismissal being rejected. We can only hope.
Under submission does not mean Judge Carter has dismissed the DOJs dismissal request. Sorry I wish it did. It simply means he will no longer take any evidence or information from either side. He has still not rendered his decision on the DOJs dismissal request. I wish this was not so. But we are still in the fight, but have not won it as of yet.
Birth Certificate?
Does it matter….?
Let’s see his passport records.
HIs Occidental College records
all other school records.
From Elementary on up.
His federal aid and status as
a minority in College/Univ.?
How many times, if ever, has
Obama scammed the system?
We need to prove so much to
get a drivers license, a passport,
a Visa, asecurity clearance.
Why would anyone think the president
should not prove his eligibility?
There are many questions and we,
the people deserve answers.
Bad news! Judge David O. Carter hired a Obama lawyer 4 days before the October court date. What is he doing with this move?
Was the $20K fine enough? Maybe when Taitz becomes a real lawyer she will appreciate what just happened. I wonder if she is a mail order bride, just like her law degree? She is perfect reporter material for “Fake News”, where unfounded rumors and innuendo reign supreme , unlike a our US courts of law, where you need to present documented facts, not half baked lies (prepare for more failures). When flies get too close to the lights they get burned, Taitz just got burned, thing is, like a fly she will continue, no end in sight. Poor little Birthers they are haters not debaters.
A lawyer, dentist, realtor and black belt, wow I must say a JACK of all trades master of none.
Birth Certificate?
Does it matter….?
Let’s see his passport records.
HIs Occidental College records
all other school records.
From Elementary on up.
His federal aid and status as
a minority in College/Univ.?
How many times, if ever, has
Obama scammed the system?
————————-
You see, you can get these (well not you), but anyone is serious enough.
Just go to Indonesia and ask to see his school record. And you are right all of these documents that you say would have his place of birth.
OBama with his name would had to produce his proof of citizenship multitude of time and as someone who has to do it often, each time a secretary makes a photocopy of it.
In other words copies of documents stating his place of birth are scattered around and hundreds of people mus have seen it. YET NO ONE HAS COME OUT. Is Obama controlling each and everyone of them? His power reaches to Indonesia and Pakistan (when entering Pakistan he had to show his passport and had to be photocopied)?
Your hatred seemed to have gotten better of your intelligence and common sesne. You rather believe in the fantastic that Obama somehow managed to scam everyone in the world, instead of more simple explanation, that his birthplace in these documents which were made available LONG BEFORE he may even have dreamed of running 4 the president; is simply what he has claimed.
Based on what I understand about how things work, if Obama is found by any means to be ineligible to hold the office of the presidency, it is something that the “invisible government” knew about in advance, and was counting on. It will give leverage to the ill-does who now control the country and were responsible for setting the country up with 3 of “their” choices for president — allowing us to only vote for one of their three (serious losers all — not a single true patriotic DEMOCRATIC American among them — all very self-serving).
If Obama is not displaced, we have already suffered, and will continue to suffer some serious setbacks as a nation (though not as badly as if we had McCain or Hillary on board). If Obama is displaced, his replacement will likely not have the country’s best interests at heart, because those who now control the White House by illegal and un-Constitutional means will never relinquish their hold.
It is an unfortunate time in U.S. history. I see nobody who understands the nature of the problem and who is prepared to offer any sort of viable solution that would restore the nation from damage done to-date. It may be at this point that we can only sit back and watch the plans for depopulation materialize as China and Russia decide how to divide up the spoils.
It is worth bearing in mind that Obama’s rise to a position of great
influence did not occur in a vacuum. While the nation was surprised –
even astonished — that a black man could be elected to the office of
the presidency, most Americans never thought about the fact that for him
to have made it that far in the first place, he had to have the nod from
certain non-public sectors, without whose support he would not have
stood a chance. So no matter what happens with Obama, those who were
responsible for putting him into office (read as not “the people,” but
rather those who engineered his victory) are still around, and will
still control the nation.
Obama will go to trial on January 26, 2010 on Eligibility Case in California
This is probably not good news. What a lot of people don’t get is that circumstances have been and will be arranged so that no matter what happens, Americans lose. Nothing we do gets us back our country. We have lost the democratic control as a people. No amount of legal wrangling or appeasements will change the course of events. Since Kennedy was assassinated and the White House was taken over, the notion that we still had a democratic republic has amounted to little more than window dressing. The nation has been engineered for failure — slowly and systematically removed from a nation of, by, and for the people, and has been replaced by the kind of secret and despotic usurpation that Eisenhower tried to warn us about (but he was too late, even then). When he talked about how “only a well-informed and diligently involved populace would save the nation from the “military-industrial complex,” he already well understood that as a nation we were no longer that involved in our government.
Remember that when Bill Clinton was placed into the office of the president, it was well documented — known and understood (by some) that he had issues with sexual promiscuity that would allow others to remove him from office later at their discretion. According to Mr. Clinton in an interview, he asked Newt Gingrich why he was being taken down and was being attacked as president. Clinton said he was told in response by Gingrich, “Because we can!” The same people who put Clinton into the office of the president knowing full well that he could be taken out later, and that the result would be a destabilized nation, were not very different people than those who put Obama into office. They have their agenda, and it bears remembering that when we see anything happen in the media, it is usually the tip of an iceberg, and that most of the reality behind the illusions of the media dog-and-pony show are beyond the knowledge of the media consumers (a.k.a., “the people”). So even when we think we know what is going on, we still don’t really know what is going on. That is the condition that best serves the interests of those who prefer to remain out of the public eye while they pull the strings from behind the scenes. It is an old and well-worn tactic to “use the sentiments of the people against them.” As long as people let their emotions do most of their thinking, anyone who can get hold of those emotions can steer their thinking for them. Without even knowing it this country can be turned upside down, and people can be made to be turned against one-another without their ever realizing that they have been duped on a grand scale by people they never knew about, and therefore never suspected.
Want something to worry about? If Carter rules that the )o( is not eligible, old Joe is nothing but a citizen being there was never a valid election. So it is Botox Nancy for 3 months until we can hold another election and start over back to January 20 2009. There will probably be a military take over to keep the peace. Hopefully the military will be on We The People’s side and not the New World Order Communists that are trying to reform our America.
“A bird in the the hand”
“Paris in in the spring”
I had students for 40 years who could not see the above items as they were written, with an extra “the” or “in”. They continued to read the sentences as if the extra words did not exist. And so it is with the birthers. They cannot see the obvious flaws in their thinking and their obvious disconnect with the legal system and the Constitution. No matter what evidence exists against them, they will not acknowledge it, choosing instead to let it be that extra word they cannot see.
I am afraid the case was dismissed by Judge Carter, in California District Court on October 29, 2009. I may be reading this wrong, but click on this link and scroll down to the end: If I’m not crazy it says he dismissed.
http://www.cacd.uscourts.gov/CACD/RecentPubOp.nsf/bb61c530eab0911c882567cf005ac6f9/8fc0c9eea056e9e78825765e005ccf99/$FILE/SA09CV00082%20DOC(ANx).pdf
Please do this. We need to get rid of that man of the devil. He is not worthy to hold the job he is in. I pray every night this trial goes on and we can get that so called president out of office.
Thanks for what you are doing.
The case was dismissed on October 29, 2009 according to snopes.
The case has been dismissed. The judge basically called the claims frivolous. There will be no trial.
Gen Patton’s Clear Vision -
Why He Was Murdered
12-5-9
At the end of World War II, one of America’s top military leaders accurately assessed the shift in the balance of world power which that war had produced and foresaw the enormous danger of communist aggression against the West. Alone among U.S. leaders he warned that America should act immediately,while her supremacy was unchallengeable, to end that danger. Unfortunately, his warning went unheeded, and he was quickly silenced by a convenient “accident” which took his life.
Thirty-two years ago, in the terrible summer of 1945, the U.S. Army had just completed the destruction of Europe and had set up a government of military occupation amid the ruins to rule the starving Germans and deal out victors’ justice to the vanquished. General George S. Patton, commander of the U.S. Third Army, became military governor of the greater portion of the American occupation zone of Germany.
It was only in the final days of the war and during his tenure as military governor of Germany — after he had gotten to know both the Germans and America’s “gallant Soviet allies” — that Patton’s understanding of the true situation grew and his opinions changed. In his diary and in many letters to his family, friends, various military colleagues, and government officials, he expressed his new understanding and his apprehensions for the future. His diary and his letters were published in 1974 by the Houghton Mifflin Company under the title The Patton Papers.
Several months before the end of the war, General Patton had recognized the fearful danger to the West posed by the Soviet Union, and he had disagreed bitterly with the orders which he had been given to hold back his army and wait for the Red Army to occupy vast stretches of German, Czech, Rumanian, Hungarian, and Yugoslav territory, which the Americans could have easily taken instead.
On May 7, 1945, just before the German capitulation, Patton had a conference in Austria with U.S. Secretary of War Robert Patterson. Patton was gravely concerned over the Soviet failure to respect the demarcation lines separating the Soviet and American occupation zones. He was also alarmed by plans in Washington for the immediate partial demobilization of the U.S. Army.
Patton said to Patterson: “Let’s keep our boots polished, bayonets sharpened, and present a picture of force and strength to the Red Army. This is the only language they understand and respect.”
Patterson replied, “Oh, George, you have been so close to this thing so long, you have lost sight of the big picture.”
Patton rejoined:
“I understand the situation. Their (the Soviet) supply system is inadequate to maintain them in a serious action such as I could put to them. They have chickens in the coop and cattle on the hoof — that’s their supply system. They could probably maintain themselves in the type of fighting I could give them for five days. After that it would make no difference how many million men they have, and if you wanted Moscow I could give it to you. They lived on the land coming down. There is insufficient left for them to maintain themselves going back. Let’s not give them time to build up their supplies. If we do, then . . . we have had a victory over the Germans and disarmed them, but we have failed in the liberation of Europe; we have lost the war!”
Patton’s urgent and prophetic advice went unheeded by Patterson and the other politicians and only served to give warning about Patton’s feelings to the alien conspirators behind the scenes in New York, Washington, and Moscow.
The more he saw of the Soviets, the stronger Patton’s conviction grew that the proper course of action would be to stifle communism then and there, while the chance existed. Later in May 1945 he attended several meetings and social affairs with top Red Army officers, and he evaluated them carefully. He noted in his diary on May 14:
“I have never seen in any army at any time, including the German Imperial Army of 1912, as severe discipline as exists in the Russian army. The officers, with few exceptions, give the appearance of recently civilized Mongolian bandits.”
And Patton’s aide, General Hobart Gay, noted in his own journal for May 14: “Everything they (the Russians) did impressed one with the idea of virility and cruelty.”
Nevertheless, Patton knew that the Americans could whip the Reds then — but perhaps not later. On May 18 he noted in his diary:
“In my opinion, the American Army as it now exists could beat the Russians with the greatest of ease, because, while the Russians have good infantry, they are lacking in artillery, air, tanks, and in the knowledge of the use of the combined arms, whereas we excel in all three of these. If it should be necessary to fight the Russians, the sooner we do it the better.”
Two days later he repeated his concern when he wrote his wife: “If we have to fight them, now is the time. From now on we will get weaker and they stronger.”
Having immediately recognized the Soviet danger and urged a course of action which would have freed all of eastern Europe from the communist yoke with the expenditure of far less American blood than was spilled in Korea and Vietnam and would have obviated both those later wars not to mention World War III — Patton next came to appreciate the true nature of the people for whom World War II was fought: the Jews.
Most of the Jews swarming over Germany immediately after the war came from Poland and Russia, and Patton found their personal habits shockingly uncivilized.
He was disgusted by their behavior in the camps for Displaced Persons (DP’s) which the Americans built for them and even more disgusted by the way they behaved when they were housed in German hospitals and private homes. He observed with horror that “these people do not understand toilets and refuse to use them except as repositories for tin cans, garbage, and refuse . . . They decline, where practicable, to use latrines, preferring to relieve themselves on the floor.”
He described in his diary one DP camp,
“where, although room existed, the Jews were crowded together to an appalling extent, and in practically every room there was a pile of garbage in one corner which was also used as a latrine. The Jews were only forced to desist from their nastiness and clean up the mess by the threat of the butt ends of rifles. Of course, I know the expression ‘lost tribes of Israel’ applied to the tribes which disappeared — not to the tribe of Judah from which the current sons of bitches are descended. However, it is my personal opinion that this too is a lost tribe — lost to all decency.”
Patton’s initial impressions of the Jews were not improved when he attended a Jewish religious service at Eisenhower’s insistence. His diary entry for September 17, 1945, reads in part:
“This happened to be the feast of Yom Kippur, so they were all collected in a large, wooden building, which they called a synagogue. It behooved General Eisenhower to make a speech to them. We entered the synagogue, which was packed with the greatest stinking bunch of humanity I have ever seen. When we got about halfway up, the head rabbi, who was dressed in a fur hat similar to that worn by Henry VIII of England and in a surplice heavily embroidered and very filthy, came down and met the General . . . The smell was so terrible that I almost fainted and actually about three hours later lost my lunch as the result of remembering it.”
These experiences and a great many others firmly convinced Patton that the Jews were an especially unsavory variety of creature and hardly deserving of all the official concern the American government was bestowing on them.
Another September diary entry, following a demand from Washington that more German housing be turned over to Jews, summed up his feelings:
“Evidently the virus started by Morgenthau and Baruch of a Semitic revenge against all Germans is still working. Harrison (a U.S. State Department official) and his associates indicate that they feel German civilians should be removed from houses for the purpose of housing Displaced Persons. There are two errors in this assumption. First, when we remove an individual German we punish an individual German, while the punishment is — not intended for the individual but for the race.
Furthermore, it is against my Anglo-Saxon conscience to remove a person from a house, which is a punishment, without due process of law. In the second place, Harrison and his ilk believe that the Displaced Person is a human being, which he is not, and this applies particularly to the Jews, who are lower than animals.”
One of the strongest factors in straightening out General Patton’s thinking on the conquered Germans was the behavior of America’s controlled news media toward them. At a press conference in Regensburg, Germany, on May 8, 1945, immediately after Germany’s surrender, Patton was asked whether he planned to treat captured SS troops differently from other German POW’s. His answer was:
“No. SS means no more in Germany than being a Democrat in America — that is not to be quoted. I mean by that that initially the SS people were special sons of bitches, but as the war progressed they ran out of sons of bitches and then they put anybody in there. Some of the top SS men will be treated as criminals, but there is no reason for trying someone who was drafted into this outfit . . .”
Despite Patton’s request that his remark not be quoted, the press eagerly seized on it, and Jews and their front men in America screamed in outrage over Patton’s comparison of the SS and the Democratic Party as well as over his announced intention of treating most SS prisoners humanely.
With great reluctance, and only after repeated promptings from Eisenhower, he had thrown German families out of their homes to make room for more than a million Jewish DP’s — part of the famous “six million” who had supposedly been gassed — but he balked when ordered to begin blowing up German factories, in accord with the infamous Morgenthau Plan to destroy Germany’s economic basis forever. In his diary he wrote:
“I doubted the expediency of blowing up factories, because the ends for which the factories are being blown up — that is, preventing Germany from preparing for war — can be equally well attained through the destruction of their machinery, while the buildings can be used to house thousands of homeless persons.”
Similarly, he expressed his doubts to his military colleagues about the overwhelming emphasis being placed on the persecution of every German who had formerly been a member of the National Socialist party. In a letter to his wife of September 14, 1945, he said:
“I am frankly opposed to this war criminal stuff. It is not cricket and is Semitic. I am also opposed to sending POW’s to work as slaves in foreign lands (i.e., the Soviet Union’s Gulags), where many will be starved to death.”
Despite his disagreement with official policy, Patton followed the rules laid down by Morgenthau and others back in Washington as closely as his conscience would allow, but he tried to moderate the effect, and this brought him into increasing conflict with Eisenhower and the other politically ambitious generals. In another letter to his wife he commented:
“I have been at Frankfurt for a civil government conference. If what we are doing (to the Germans) is ‘Liberty, then give me death.’ I can’t see how Americans can sink so low. It is Semitic, and I am sure of it.”
And in his diary he noted:,
“Today we received orders . . . in which we were told to give the Jews special accommodations. If for Jews, why not Catholics, Mormons, etc? . . . We are also turning over to the French several hundred thousand prisoners of war to be used as slave labor in France. It is amusing to recall that we fought the Revolution in defense of the rights of man and the Civil War to abolish slavery and have now gone back on both principles.”
His duties as military governor took Patton to all parts of Germany and intimately acquainted him with the German people and their condition. He could not help but compare them with the French, the Italians, the Belgians, and even the British. This comparison gradually forced him to the conclusion that World War II had been fought against the wrong people.
After a visit to ruined Berlin, he wrote his wife on July 21, 1945: “Berlin gave me the blues. We have destroyed what could have been a good race, and we are about to replace them with Mongolian savages. And all Europe will be communist. It’s said that for the first week after they took it (Berlin), all women who ran were shot and those who did not were raped. I could have taken it (instead of the Soviets) had I been allowed.”
This conviction, that the politicians had used him and the U.S. Army for a criminal purpose, grew in the following weeks. During a dinner with French General Alphonse Juin in August, Patton was surprised to find the Frenchman in agreement with him. His diary entry for August 18 quotes Gen. Juin: “It is indeed unfortunate, mon General, that theEnglish and the Americans have destroyed in Europe the only sound country — and I do not mean France. Therefore, the road is now open for the advent of Russian communism.”
Later diary entries and letters to his wife reiterate this same conclusion. On August 31 he wrote: “Actually, theGermans are the only decent people left in Europe. it’s a choice between them and the Russians. I prefer the Germans.” And on September 2: “What we are doing is to destroy the only semi-modern state in Europe, so that Russia can swallow the whole.”
By this time the Morgenthauists and media monopolists had decided that Patton was incorrigible and must be discredited. So they began a non-stop hounding of him in the press, a la Watergate, accusing him of being “soft on Nazis” and continually recalling an incident in which he had slapped a shirker two years previously, during the Sicily campaign. A New York newspaper printed the completely false claim that when Patton had slapped the soldier who was Jewish, he had called him a “yellow-bellied Jew.”
Then, in a press conference on September 22, reporters hatched a scheme to needle Patton into losing his temper and making statements which could be used against him. The scheme worked. The press interpreted one of Patton’s answers to their insistent questions as to why he was not pressing the Nazi-hunt hard enough as: “The Nazi thing is just like a Democrat-Republican fight.” The New York Times headlined this quote, and other papers all across America picked it up.
The unmistakable hatred which had been directed at him during this press conference finally opened Patton’s eyes fully as to what was afoot. In his diary that night lie wrote:
“There is a very apparent Semitic influence in the press. They are trying to do two things: first, implement communism, and second, see that all businessmen of German ancestry and non-Jewish antecedents are thrown out of their jobs.
“They have utterly lost the Anglo-Saxon conception of justice and feel that a man can be kicked out because somebody else says he is a Nazi. They were evidently quite shocked when I told them I would kick nobody out without the successful proof of guilt before a court of law . . .
“Another point which the press harped on was the fact that we were doing too much for the Germans to the detriment of the DP’s, most of whom are Jews. I could not give the answer to that one, because the answer is that, in my opinion and that of most nonpolitical officers, it is vitally necessary for us to build Germany up now as a buffer state against Russia. In fact, I am afraid we have waited too long.”
And in a letter of the same date to his wife: “I will probably be in the headlines before you get this, as the press is trying to quote me as being more interested in restoring order in Germany than in catching Nazis. I can’t tell them the truth that unless we restore Germany we will insure that communism takes America.”
Eisenhower responded immediately to the press outcry against Patton and made the decision to relieve him of his duties as military governor and “kick him upstairs” as the commander of the Fifteenth Army. In a letter to his wife on September 29, Patton indicated that he was, in a way, not unhappy with his new assignment, because “I would like it much better than being a sort of executioner to the best race in Europe.”
On October 22 he wrote a long letter to Maj. Gen. James G. Harbord, who was back in the States. In the letter Patton bitterly condemned the Morgenthau policy; Eisenhower’s pusillanimous behavior in the face of Jewish demands; the strong pro-Soviet bias in the press; and the politicization, corruption, degradation, and demoralization of the U.S. Army which these things were causing.
He saw the demoralization of the Army as a deliberate goal of America’s enemies:
“I have been just as furious as you at the compilation of lies which the communist and Semitic elements of our government have leveled against me and practically every other commander. In my opinion it is a deliberate attempt to alienate the soldier vote from the commanders, because the communists know that soldiers are not communistic, and they fear what eleven million votes (of veterans) would do.”
In his letter to Harbord, Patton also revealed his own plans to fight those who were destroying the morale and integrity of the Army and endangering America’s future by not opposing the growing Soviet might:
“It is my present thought . . . that when I finish this job, which will be around the first of the year, I shall resign, not retire, because if I retire I will still have a gag in my mouth . . . I should not start a limited counterattack, which would be contrary to my military theories, but should wait until I can start an all- out offensive . . . .”
Riiight, like a court is really gonna convinct the world’s most powerful man…highly unlikely, in my opinion.
I can’t believe you people are that stupid. I guess anything is possible with the birthers. I hope the judge holds you in contempt of court. This case has been dismissed and these people know it. They just want the publicity.
Riiight…because ronatvan.com is such an incredible and reliable news source. Once you show us the actual court records, I will believe you.. otherwise, you’re full of S#!+!
Fuck Obama! He is an usurper!
Floyd Brown has 90,000 signers to have this man impeached. He needs 100,000. He’s going mobile very soon. Let’s get “OOO” impeached as quickly as possible before he destroys America as we have always known it. This man is an enemy of this country, that is evident by what decisions he makes that are directly against her.
http://www.impeachobamacampaign.com/
There are cases against “OOO” for treason also. The wheels of justice are turning slowly, but turning. We cannot wait until 2012. There will be nothing left. We won’t recognize this country. Thanks!